Altair announces commercial TD-LTE reference design

Altair Semiconductor announced commercial availability of a new TD-LTE reference design for use in dongles, data cards, consumer premise equipment and mobile handheld devices.

The reference design features Altair's FourGee 3100/6200 chipset and supports spectrum bands that encompass India's recently auction TD-LTE band 40, China's band 38 and a number of other bands where TD-LTE might make its appearance in Japan, North America and Europe, the company said. The reference design features a unified TDD/FDD architecture using a single chipset and a single software stack, enabling a small form factor and cost efficient integration for multimode devices, Altair said.

"The demand for TD-LTE products, mainly in emerging markets such as India and China, is rapidly increasing, forcing carriers to develop cost-effective solutions for this growing segment," Eran Eshed, Altair's co-founder and vice president of marketing and business development said in a statement. "Thanks to the maturity of Altair's FD-LTE solution which had sampled in September 2009, and the extensive testing it had undergone with most tier one infrastructure vendors, releasing a TD-LTE version was a logical next step for us."

Altair recently announced a partnership with IPWireless to develop a suite of multi-band LTE modem products that will support key frequency bands ideally suited to global LTE deployments. The companies will integrate Altair's cutting-edge software-defined radio baseband processor into IPWireless' LTE devices. The first consumer-friendly LTE USB modem device will support multiple frequency bands including the 800MHz digital dividend band, 1800 MHz and TD-LTE's 2.5 GHz. Subsequent devices will also support the entire US 700MHz and AWS frequency.

For more:
- see this release

Related articles:
Sequans Announces Successful TD-LTE Technology Demo for China Mobile at World Expo 2010 in Shanghai
China Mobile aims to push TD-LTE overseas
GSMA's technology director talks up TD-LTE opportunity
Ericsson gets serious about TD-LTE
TD-LTE: The most powerful weapon in the LTE arsenal against WiMAX

TeliaSonera touts new mobile broadband pricing model

TeliaSonera, which operates the world's first LTE networks in Sweden and Norway, is mulling a new mobile data pricing model that involves bundling the network usage charges with the cost of mobile content used into a single pricing plan. As such, subscribers would be paying for the content and network resources they are using up instead of simply paying for a certain amount of data.

"We would like to go into some sort of value-based pricing," said Håkan Dahlström, president of mobility services at TeliaSonera, during the operator's second-quarter conference call with analysts. "If you buy a movie, you would have the price of the traffic for that movie included in the price of the movie."

It's unclear when TeliaSonera might introduce this value-based pricing nor whether it would replace monthly contracts. The operator current charges for bandwidth speed and volume meaning 3 gigabytes of data on the LTE network costs about $47 per month. The same amount of data on the 3G network costs $41 per month.

For more:
- see this Light Reading Mobile article

Related articles:
'M2M opportunity bigger than mobile', claims TeliaSonera exec
TeliaSonera launches first commercial LTE network
TeliaSonera picks Ericsson, NSN for LTE

Survey: Verizon smartphone users consume more data than iPhone users

A forthcoming survey from wireless billing company Validas indicates Verizon Wireless (NYSE:VZ) smartphone users consume more wireless data than AT&T's (NYSE:T), iPhones by a ratio of roughly 1.25 to 1. Average monthly wireless data consumption for Verizon Wireless smartphone users is 421 megabytes per month, versus 338 megabytes per month for iPhones.

"Averages can be misleading because when you plot data users in a distribution, you quickly see that there is no typical user--they are spread across a broad range," said Ed Finegold, executive vice president-Analytics, for Validas in a statement. "The key detail in this study that drives the average is that, by percentage, nearly twice as many Verizon Wireless smartphone users are consuming 500 megabytes to 1 gigabyte per month compared to AT&T iPhone users." More than 11 percent of Verizon Wireless smartphone users fall into this category, versus just 5.6 percent of iPhone users, he added.

Some other interesting tidbits:

  • More than 54 percent of Verizon Wireless smartphones consume less than 200 MB per month, versus slightly more than 52 percent of iPhones.
  • Nearly 46 percent of Verizon Wireless smartphone users consume more than 200 MB per month, versus nearly 48 percent of iPhones. 
  • More than 4 percent of Verizon Wireless smartphone customers consume more than 2 gigabytes per month, as opposed to just 1.6 percent of iPhones. Only 2/10ths of 1 percent of both VZW Smartphones and iPhones use more than 5 GBs per month.

The data for this analysis was derived from more than 20,000 consumer wireless bills dated between January and May of 2010. Validas said it deliberately excluded BlackBerry devices which, due to data compression techniques, do not follow similar data consumption patterns to those of iPhones and other smartphones.

It should be interesting to see the data now that AT&T has changed its smartphone data pricing plans to a tiered model.

For more:
- see this Validas release

Related articles:
Verizon adds 1.4M subs in Q2, as reseller customers swarm ranks
Verizon: No immediate plans for tiered data pricing
AT&T's net adds soar with 3.2M iPhone activations
AT&T kills unlimited data pricing, supports iPhone tethering

LightSquared talks LTE wholesale strategy

Thanks to additional funding and an infrastructure deal, Philip Falcone and his private-equity firm Harbinger Capital Partners may be closer to making their nationwide wholesale LTE network a reality. Nevertheless, the firm's plans are drawing the ire of skeptics who believe it's unlikely the network will ever come to fruition. But LightSquared, the name of the LTE network, has already talked to more than 30 companies interested in partnering with it, said the company's Chief Marketing Officer Frank Boulben.This includes a combination of wireline operators, cable operators, rural carriers, retailers and even device makers. Article

What does it take to migrate from WiMAX to LTE?

Monica Paolini, Senza Fili ConsultingBack in March I wrote a column on how TD-LTE was threatening to steal the spotlight from WiMAX by offering operators virtually the same technology and performance in a  more attractive wrapping--i.e., access to a larger market, more vendors and roaming opportunities. The article was mostly speculative and published before Yota's announcement to roll out LTE, and before Indian BWA operators disclosed their interest in TD-LTE. I was surprised to see how quickly in the past few month WiMAX operators have started to talk openly about the transition to TD-LTE or even to FDD LTE, and how they increasingly take for granted the ability to move seamlessly to LTE.

WiMAX and LTE share most of the RAN and core network, so the transition path to LTE will be smoother than, for instance, the transition path from HSPA to LTE. The trends towards RAN-agnostic base station platforms that can accommodate multiple wireless interfaces and towards user devices that support multiple interfaces further facilitate this transition. A few years ago, a RAN upgrade would have required the deployment of a separate overlay network that would have been difficult if not impossible to integrate with legacy networks.

Yet the transition to LTE will not be painless, and WiMAX operators should start planning for it now, so that they will be ready for it, if and when they decide to move to LTE. In the rest of this article I will go over some of the key decision points for WiMAX operators considering a transition to LTE.

Network coexistence: overlay or swap?

In the long term, most WiMAX operators that deploy LTE are likely to aim for a complete swap to LTE, simply because supporting two comparable networks adds unnecessary costs and complexity. In the short to medium term, however, operators may decide to build an overlay LTE network that coexists with their WiMAX network. This is the path chosen by Yota in Russia. The operator plans to deploy LTE in markets where it does not have WiMAX or as a second overlay network where WiMAX is available. This is a solution that guarantees a smooth transition for subscribers, who will keep using their WiMAX devices, and allow new subscribers to choose between WiMAX or LTE. However, only operators with sufficient spectrum can afford an overlay network. In addition, an overlay network requires a higher capex, as new base stations need to be installed, even if the deployed WiMAX base stations are upgradeable to WiMAX.

The alternative path is to plan for a network swap. Ahead of the swap, the operator deploys devices that support both WiMAX and LTE and then it gradually upgrades the base stations. Installation and equipment costs are lower, especially if the base stations can be upgraded and no additional spectrum is required, as long as TD-LTE is used or the operator can use the spectrum for FDD-LTE (see below). A swap requires more intensive planning, to ensure that subscriber devices all support both interfaces and will successfully switch to the new interface as it is turned on.

Spectrum: TDD or FDD?

WiMAX operators using the IEEE 802.16e version of the standard (Mobile WiMAX) use TDD, unpaired spectrum, with the same channel used for uplink and downlink transmission. The most common version of LTE, the one deployed by Verizon and by most mobile operators, uses FDD paired spectrum, with one channel used for uplink transmission and one for downlink transmission.

A second version of LTE, TD-LTE uses TDD spectrum and it will be widely deployed in China. Also, it is the version of LTE that Clearwire appears to be most interested in (but it may deploy FDD LTE as well). The transition path from WiMAX to TD-LTE is more straightforward. The same spectrum band can be used and infrastructure equipment upgrades are possible (although not necessarily available, depending on the vendor and on the version of the equipment).

Moving to FDD LTE may require the acquisition of new spectrum--this is the case for Yota--as regulation typically dictates whether spectrum bands can be used for TDD or FDD. Furthermore, acquiring new spectrum is difficult and expensive (FDD spectrum typically costs more than TDD spectrum).

The advantage of FDD LTE is that the market is considerably larger and equipment is already commercially available. This makes a transition in the short term possible, and widens the choice of devices and the revenue opportunity for roaming.

Base stations: what can be upgraded?

Despite the similarity in the underlying technology between WiMAX and LTE, not all WiMAX base stations can be upgraded to TD-LTE. Most of the early WiMAX base stations cannot be upgraded (or upgrades are partial, and require a substantial equipment cost), but many vendors now offer LTE-ready base stations. Upgradability to FDD LTE is considerably more difficult because of the use of two channels by this technology.

Core network integration

As both WiMAX and LTE use an all-IP core network, upgrades are possible, but may entail the replacement of some core elements. Integration among the WiMAX and LTE core networks is also possible and desirable in the case of overlay networks to enable subscribers to use both seamlessly. There are some differences in the core network architecture of WiMAX and LTE, however, and these require a clear transition plan and the selection of equipment that facilitates this process.

Devices: a roadmap to multimode?

WiMAX devices currently in the market do not support either TD-LTE or FDD LTE. WiMAX operators that wish to deploy an LTE network in the near future have to replace the devices if they swap networks or will not be able to enable roaming across networks for their subscribers who wish to keep their current devices. As WiMAX operators are not planning to swap networks in the short term, this is not a major concern. However operators considering an LTE overlay network should encourage subscribers to adopt multimode devices as they become available, so that by the time they are ready to launch the LTE network most subscribers have devices that can access it.

The increasing availability and affordability of multimode devices makes the transition to LTE more attractive to WiMAX operators, as operators are free to move to LTE at the pace they choose, taking advantage both of the wider choice of WiMAX devices today, and of wider availability and possibly lower cost of LTE devices in the future.

Timeline: when does it make sense to switch?

The timing of the move to LTE depends on multiple factors, such as spectrum availability, funding, or market conditions. These factors vary from country to country, and from operator to operator. For most WiMAX operators, it is too early to move to LTE, because the technology is still less mature than WiMAX, and its ecosystem is still evolving. Only once the technology is widely deployed and device selection is at least as good as WiMAX it will make sense for operators to move ahead with the transition.

The operators' choices will vary depending on requirements, funding, spectrum assets and overall market conditions. Many operators will not have many open options, mostly because of restrictions in spectrum availability. In all cases, however, WiMAX operators stand to benefit to start their assessment and planning processes now, to minimize the future cost and the disruption of the transition to LTE.

Monica Paolini, PhD, is the founder and president of Senza Fili Consulting and can be contacted at monica.paolini@senzafiliconsulting.com. Senza Fili Consulting provides expert advisory services on wireless data technologies and services.

Envivio lands $15 million in new funding

Encoding specialist Envivio says it's landed $15 million in financing from venture capital and banking sources. The company, which says it is experiencing 100 percent year-over-year sales growth, and has been extremely active in the cable market, including extensive involvement in new service introductions and trials for the top five cable services providers in North America.

"Envivio has been ahead of the video delivery technology curve for years, which is why we have been the choice when operators look to shake up their markets with innovation," said Julien Signès, Envivio's co-Founder, President and CEO. "We have created a unified platform that delivers premier quality TV service to any device with a screen.

In recent months the company has shaken up its management team adding Erik Miller as CFO, Kevin O'Keefe as COO. Envivio's Chairman of the Board, Gianluca Rattazzi, has taken an increased role at the company as executive chairman to assist with corporate and business development.

For more:
- see this release

Related articles:
Envivio touts multi-screen on-demand platform
Envivio has been a Microsoft Mediaroom partner
Envivio and other transcoding firms are key to multi-screen TV

IPTV: Standing on the brink of explosive growth, and big earnings

Jim O'NeillAT&T last week reported second quarter earnings and, as it did in the first quarter, reported that its U-verse subscriptions and IP-related revenues once again were the stars of wireline. Subs bumped a whopping 209,000 for the quarter, bringing the telco to the 2.5 million-customer mark, a pretty heady benchmark. What's even more impressive is the U-verse growth over the past year: 60 percent, and with the reports that it will start rolling out pair bonded VDSL--which will allow the telco to extend its U-verse service up to 2,000 feet--the next couple of quarters could see even bigger subscriber growth.

Verizon, also reported subscriber gains for its FiOS service, 174,000 new customers for the quarter to give it 3.2 million FiOS TV subscribers.

Now, my brother-in-arms at FierceCable, Jim Barthold, would say it's a drop in the bucket next to Comcast's 18.8 million digital cable subs.

But you have to believe that Comcast--and Jim--are taking note of the rate of growth of both services, as well as the phenomenal ARPU each saw in the second quarter. AT&T U-verse triple play customers (who make up some three-quarters of all U-verse subs) turned out a stellar $160, up 13.8 percent from the same quarter in 2009, which helped U-verse revenues exceed $1 billion for the quarter, a first.

Verizon, meanwhile, saw FiOS revenues top $1.8 billion and said ARPU for FiOS subscribers was more than $145.

Jaime Fink, CTO of 2Wire, (see this interview) which this week was bought by STB-maker Pace, said he expects IPTV growth to blossom in the coming months as smaller telcos take advantage of a number of technological breakthroughs--like AT&T's pair bonded VDSL, and Alcatel-Lucent's Integrated Solution for Microsoft Mediaroom, its new compact IPTV offering that takes advantage of virtual networks and rapid deployment.

Alca-Lu's VP for multimedia integration Geeta Chaudhary said she expects the company to see as many as 30 new deployments in the U.S. this year.

"We're pretty bullish on this one," she said, as smaller telcos begin to see a clearer business case for an IPTV rollout that will make them better able to stand up to their cable and satellite competition, offering better service options and a more robust offering.

Add to that the number of tier 2 and 3 telcos that have taken advantage of the broadband stimulus package to expand their fiber footprints (by the way, if you have, and you'd like to talk about your plans for using that grant, drop me a line), and you can see how this next quarter or two could be barnstormers for the IPTV industry.-Jim

U.K. STB-maker Amino sees revenue, sales gains in H1

U.K.-based set-top box manufacturer Amino Technologies hit some rough road in the first six months of the year, reporting an operating loss of $1.5 million, an improvement from a loss of $5.6 million in the first six months of 2009, despite seeing a revenues increase of 41 percent to $28.2 million from the same period a year ago.

But, the company said its core IPTV business saw MPEG-4 shipments make up 79 percent of its overall shipments, adding that they were up 325 percent over the previous year.

The launch of new products has helped the company gain increasing traction in both its traditional IPTV and the emerging hybrid/OTT markets.

Amino said higher component costs, and reduced margins on large sales to Tier 2 operators contributed to the loss.

"This has been an encouraging H1 performance, with record booked unit sales, that builds on the momentum from the second half of the previous year," said Keith Todd, non-executive chairman. "Profitability has been impacted by foreign exchange movements, higher component prices and the adjustment of margins as the company scales into tier 1 and tier 2 markets, where important new contracts have been secured during the period."

Todd said it had an order book of 250,000 units, representing $32.7 million in revenues, giving Amino strong revenues for the remainder of the year. He said Amino, expected production cost improvements and supply chain efficiencies to have a positive influence in 2011.

"The combination of a healthy H2 order book, improving market conditions and a new product portfolio provide confidence we are in line with management forecasts for the full year," he said.

Amino, which specializes in digital entertainment solutions for IPTV, Internet TV and in-home multimedia distribution, had a number of important contract wins in the Tier 2 IPTV market in Europe and South America, and says they're evidence of the company's ability to scale its operations to meet the demands of major operators.

For more:
- see this release

Related articles:
IPTV World Series Awards 2010 Winners Announced
Amino hits milestone for STB shipments
Amino secures set-top box contract with Romtelecom
Amino's Freedom DVB-T hybrid/OTT media center to show at NAB

CTO Jaime Fink talks about what being bought by Pace means to 2Wire

Jaime Fink, CTO, 2WireHome gateway manufacturer 2Wire was tentatively acquired this week by U.K.-based set-top box specialist Pace in a $475 million deal that should close before the end of the year. 2Wire CTO Jaime Fink took time to talk with FierceIPTV about what the deal means to the company in the near- and long-term, and about how changing market conditions and consumer expectations helped bring the two companies together.

FierceIPTV: What does the deal with Pace mean to 2Wire?

Jaime Fink: Certainly a lot of space for us to grow given the kind of company Pace is, so we're pretty excited about it on this side, it's definitely a set of equal partners coming in, in different spaces. It's a pretty exciting opportunity for us.

The businesses have operated very differently to get where we are, but the end game as to how we believe media is going to transform the home is such a common principle between the two of us. The gateway is becoming highly strategic and they understand that. We think that's going to make this a very good partnership in the end.

FierceIPTV: Your business with AT&T obviously is very important, but getting 2Wire, for Pace, is much deeper than that, isn't it.

2Wire gatewayFink: No question about it. Obviously we have the relationships, especially in the IPTV environment, that are typically using Microsoft Mediaroom, those are areas that are new for Pace and are stuff that they have not been able to spread their wings on yet, so I think they clearly see this as a way to get pre-plugged in and work with us to really take that experience to the next level.

To a large extent being able to work with middleware providers and the service providers on an end-to-end solution inclusive of the set-top box, that's something that's been harder for 2Wire to do on our own. And that's something service providers have been asking for that's been difficult for them to gain by dealing with each of the individual product vendors separately. Our emphasis will truly be to do what we have done in the past--make the user experience in the home that much easier, plug and play, automated diagnostics, self-help and all those things 2Wire has done in the home network and extent that to the TV experience. That's a huge opportunity.

There's a lot of things that can be done when we merge together home media and the over-the-top opportunities that Pace is definitely starting to capitalize on for the first time.

FierceIPTV: End-to-end is the new buzzword  right now, isn't it?

Fink: It sure is, and it's very vague to most people. Where we have focused is more on the experience as it relates to tying the home into the telco's network and being able to make differentiated services become a manageable function, and customer support be an incredibly advanced function because the two are tied together when you hit the home network.

That kind of regulated endpoint is really a vague point now as a result of what happened with the (growth) of the home network, and that's something that we're just absolutely experts on at 2Wire. I believe that Pace is really going to be able to take advantage of that, not just in the telco space, but there's a lot of talk going on these days about how the cable world looks at the digital home and is really rethinking the way that things like management technologies extending into the home will happen

There are a lot of inquiries about things like broadband forum TR-69 technology extending into the cable and the satellite world, so, again, I think its an area where we can bring really good pieces of development and very mature technology into product spaces that, because there wasn't overlap between vendors in each space before, there wasn't a lot of push for companies like us to go into those spaces.

Now we have not only the momentum of a company behind that, but the tools ready to go do so.

FierceIPTV: Is IPTV going to accelerate in the U.S.? Are smaller telcos going to get into IPTV?

Fink: There's no question that there's a lot more investment going on in the space now, the challenge has been that smaller telcos are dealing with long loops, and they're not predisposed to putting fiber out to the home. Getting an economics model that really extends loop lengths at a lower cost is important. What I think that you're going to see is that the overall capex model--that they have to spend to get network out there--has been pretty biased against them.

If you look at a lot of the technologies that we've been working on with some of the products announced recently at AT&T, like DSL bonding, which has been extremely successful in the field, most people don't really understand how much influence that really could have in the small markets where they can now double loop length without putting out the cost into fiber in the ground.

If we can help in that area, that'll be a big, big push.

With Microsoft and others dealing with these virtualized server architectures that have been announced recently, with their excitement, certainly the set top box folks are excited, too. It's something that we are showing for the first time with AT&T in the field, and usually we see about a six- to 12-month lag between other customers recognizing that and wanting to take advantage of AT&T's technology and the scale that they bring to the table.

We are getting pretty aggressive about taking that technology to other customers, so we think it's a big opportunity. We don't know yet exactly how big of one it is, and actually can't comment on that at this point, but we're very bullish about what the opportunity is in those areas. And, frankly, Pace is extremely good at being able to leverage many more customers than 2Wire has been able to scale up to because we've been so focused on AT&T.

We're really looking forward to gaining a lot of that operational experience and the ability to jump out and do a lot more accounts.

FierceIPTV: Would you expect to have a greater exposure in Europe now as well, because of Pace's presence, and the state of IPTV, on the Continent?

Fink: Definitely. And there's a fair amount of cable and satellite there where Pace is pretty good. We have definitely tried to find our feet in places in Europe and have a couple of good experiences with both BT and with Portugal Telecom we have some good IPTV experience, and we expect to continue those experiences. But there's no question Pace brings a completely different front for us in Europe in the long run.

There also is a big evolution happening right now around media in the home with European customers; they are pushing the vision of a hybrid gateway television experience. I'm probably the lead person going out into those markets and talking to the customers and dealing with the vision side of things. There is no question our roadmap aligns with their desire to both operationalize IPTV to be a lower-cost approach by centralizing TV functions in things like a gateway, and using standard equipment to interoperate with. These are things I think we all share from a vision perspective. And that will align very well with European customers for us.

But I think we'll start by really bringing what we have to the table so that we can get real operational efficiency and scale with some of those customers. And, Pace will help us represent that very well.

In the long term, obviously, it represents the right vision approach about integrating home technologies in the home network, because that's really where most of these guys are talking. We know that's typically a two- to three-year process to really change the way that technology works inside of the home. For now, we think we have the right portfolios together to move forward and definitely the right vision based on what we're hearing in the field.

FierceIPTV: Six months ago, over-the-top delivery was seen as a threat to operators, that's changed dramatically.

2Wire MediaroomFink: No question about that. I don't think for a second that we really ever believed that over-the-top would be able to be successful by itself. I think you can point to a large number of boxes in the market that have never made it, and that includes Apple TV, that includes the Boxee experiences and things like that.

Consumers just have no interest in adding another device to connect to their television, especially where they've got Xboxes and PlayStation 3s and things like that.

The broadcast experience for television is going to be around for a while. It's a much better lead place to bring in over-the-top, in addition to integration into the gaming platforms and things like that, versus going in with a completely stand-alone over-the-top solution.

When you bring together the abilities to merge content from a lot of places, from an electronic programming guide perspective, and having both the broadcast link and over-the-top Internet link, and you can bend that experience well, this is an area where we saw AT&T work with us years ago.

We have a lot of experience in that field, Pace has a lot of experience in that field. It doesn't necessarily overlap, but there are a lot of joint approaches that we think we can bring to the table to make the best hybrid experience in the market.

FierceIPTV: Is there any significance to the timing of this deal, or was it just the right time to happen?

Fink: There was no specific driver. Looking at the 2Wire scale right now we know that--while AT&T has been an amazing customer--obviously it has been extraordinarily difficult for us to deconcentrate those percentages of revenue because AT&T just keeps growing so fast and they push the envelope technically so strongly that it really took a lot of our focus. We believe that the ability to scale into other customers is something that Pace has, and something that we will be able to really gain over time. Being able to replicate the AT&T technology in more markets is something that we both have as a huge goal. And, that's not just limited to telcos. As a company, we limited ourselves to telcos, for a number of reasons over time, but we're really able to break free of those boundaries now, which I think is where Pace has it biggest complementary strengths with us.

Financially we've always been in great health, and we expect to add to the bottom line very well for Pace over the first year. It was also definitely AT&T wanting to see 2Wire as a growing and stronger company and it seemed like the right timing for that, and for Alcatel-Lucent, this was a company that obviously could work well with them.

FierceIPTV: How intact will 2Wire be after the purchase.

Fink: Pace is very structured regionally and divisionally from a product perspective. So, as of now, we expect to be extraordinarily intact and expect no changes. In the near term for sure, in the long term, you never know about these things. I do believe we will take a fair amount of time to align our longer-term vision technology and make sure that we're building toward a much more common global platform. And that's something we all are going to learn about over the next years. As of now, we obviously must maintain 2Wire as an entity to be able to support AT&T and that was one of the primary drivers of this particular relationship, the intent to maintain 2Wire as it is.

FierceIPTV: It sounds like a great tie up for 2Wire...

Fink: I really think so, and it's an exciting time for us.

UK set-top box maker buys 2Wire for $475M

U.K.-based set-top box maker Pace is buying U.S. counterpart 2Wire in a $475 million cash deal that will give Pace better access to the Tier 1 U.S. telco market--especially AT&T's U-verse deployment--expanding upon its already solid position with cable and satellite operators in North America.

The proposed deal likely will be completed during the fourth quarter, following approval of Pace and 2Wire shareholders, as well as regulatory approvals.

Acquiring 2Wire, which currently is owned by a consortium including Alcatel-Lucent, AT&T, Telmex, Oak Investment Partners, Meritech Capital Partners, and Technology Crossover Ventures, would make Pace the number one provider of telco residential gateway devices in the U.S. and the number three provider globally. It already ranks as the number one global digital set-top box company, according to IMS Research.

"Pace is an excellent strategic fit for the 2Wire business and will enable us to take our products and services to the next level of their development," said Pasquale Romano, CEO of 2Wire. "The combined customer base, engineering capability and product breadth of Pace and 2Wire make this a compelling transaction for our customers, our employees and our end users globally."

2Wire products and services include residential gateways, multi-service media platforms, remote management systems, value-added services, customer support, and end-to-end integration and professional services. 2Wire customers are leading broadband providers throughout the U.S., Canada, Latin America, Europe, Australia, and Asia, including AT&T, Bell Canada, Telmex, BT, SingTel, and others.

The deal gives Pace deep leverage in the telco marketplace.

"This acquisition will strengthen our Americas business, extending Pace's U.S. market coverage with entry into the Tier 1 telco market," said Neil Gaydon, Chief Executive Officer of Pace. "2Wire, with its expertise in the broadband residential gateway market, will enable us to address a full range of U.S. operator requirements."

Gaydon said the 2Wire acquisitions will help further Pace's home entertainment convergence strategy development and introduce deep client relationships with important customers including AT&T.

"We admire 2Wire's technology and the position they have built as an acknowledged leader in the telco gateway market. We look forward to working together," he said. Pace has been in the marketplace for more than 25 years and counts among its clients some of the biggest pay-TV operators in the world including BSkyB, Time Warner Cable and some 100 other pay-TV operators.

For more:
- see this release

Related articles:
Pace moves past Motorola, Technicolor to claim top spot in global STB shipments
STB comeback: Pace claims No. 2, will buy Bewan